🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is claiming compensation valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a direct warning by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in Russian state media, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

EU leaders will decide in the coming days on a plan to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and financial stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, such as seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has previously noted it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in EU countries are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are developing steps to deter other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. They are also designing safeguards to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be obligated to repay the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she stated. "It also delivers a powerful signal that when you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."